<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sql server performing slow after changing the Cost Threshold for parallelism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sqlserverfaq.net/2008/10/13/sql-server-performing-slow-after-changing-the-cost-threshold-for-parallelism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sqlserverfaq.net/2008/10/13/sql-server-performing-slow-after-changing-the-cost-threshold-for-parallelism/</link>
	<description>Learn Sql Server through my Experience</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 22:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: java training</title>
		<link>http://www.sqlserverfaq.net/2008/10/13/sql-server-performing-slow-after-changing-the-cost-threshold-for-parallelism/#comment-7711</link>
		<dc:creator>java training</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 18:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sqlserverfaq.net/?p=22#comment-7711</guid>
		<description>It's good to know that it's best to go with the default value for the Cost Threshold Of Parallelism and avoid manipulating the behavior of optimizer. That might be why I've been having problems. I'll have to do some tests and see how the optimizer responds in our production environment. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good to know that it&#8217;s best to go with the default value for the Cost Threshold Of Parallelism and avoid manipulating the behavior of optimizer. That might be why I&#8217;ve been having problems. I&#8217;ll have to do some tests and see how the optimizer responds in our production environment. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
