<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="WordPress/2.5" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Sql Server Faq</title>
	<link>http://www.sqlserverfaq.net</link>
	<description>Learn Sql Server through my Experience</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 11:40:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>Transactional Replication in SQL 2008 Fails &#8220;The distribution agent failed to create temporary files in &#8216;C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\100\COM&#8217; directory. System returned errorcode 5.&#8221;</title>
		<description><![CDATA[It has been really long time since I have updated this blog as my Job involves a lot of travel however I try my best to update it frequently. In this blog I am going to discuss a issue which one of Customers encountered recently.
Recently One of Customers had upgraded to SQL 2008 with Transactional [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.sqlserverfaq.net/2010/08/15/transactional-replication-in-sql-2008-fails-the-distribution-agent-failed-to-create-temporary-files-in-cprogram-filesmicrosoft-sql-server100com-directory-system-returned-errorcode/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Fragmentation should not be the only factor which decides the Rebuild Index</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Until now I was under the impression that fragmentation in the Index is the only factor which decides whether we should rebuild the index.
&#160;
As a rule of thumb we always recommend that when the avg_fragmentation_in_percent in the view&#160; sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats&#160; is between 5 and 30
We should reorganize the index and when the fragmentation is greater than [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://www.sqlserverfaq.net/2010/06/28/fragmentation-should-not-be-the-only-factor-which-decides-the-rebuild-index/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
